Showing posts with label World Congress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label World Congress. Show all posts

Tuesday, 3 May 2011

Congress is a great opportunity for exploring ways to protect and empower consumers

Dignatories, Hong Kong Consumer Council and Consumers International Council toast the opening of World Congress
Hong Kong Consumer Council CEO, Connie Lau, has welcomed delegates to the CI World Congress.
As we gather to welcome members of Consumers International and friends from across the globe, I want to thank you all for joining us at this wonderful event.

This is the second time that Hong Kong has hosted the CI World Congress. We are honoured to have you here at this great meeting, with representatives from more than 100 countries, and with the largest number of participants ever from China.

This is a moment not only to foster cultural understanding and partnership, it also presents a great opportunity for exploring ways to protect and empower consumer rights. In the next three days, we will talk about sustainable consumption and the green economy; consumer protection in financial services; food safety and nutrition; as well as intellectual property .

These topics on the agenda are some of the most complex challenges that will be faced by consumers in the 21st century. In our increasingly interconnected world, I believe that no countries will be left untouched by these issues.

So let us dedicate ourselves to writing the next chapter in the history of consumer right and protection, and we shall carry forward the goals with a broader vision and more proactive approach.

Once again, I wish to express our warm welcome and cordial greetings to all our distinguished guests, and I hope you will enjoy your stay in Hong Kong!

Thursday, 17 March 2011

A vision for consumer empowerment


The 15 March 2011 saw consumer groups across the globe celebrating World Consumer Rights Day. To mark this inspiring occasion, former CI President, Professor Anwar Fazal, gives a fascinating account of what consumer action means to him.

Professor Fazal will be addressing the theme of consumer empowerment as a keynote speaker at
CI's World Congress, 3-6 May in Hong Kong.

Some 3,500 years ago, the Hittites of Anatolia, which is now in Turkey, had a consumer code relating to food matters. This code had two principles:

'Thou shall not POISON thy neighbour’s fat' – i.e. food should be safe and wholesome.

'Thou shall not BEWITCH thy neighbour’s fat' – i.e. that there should be no cheating or misleading.

These two principles apply as much today as they did then.

The consumer movement is today a world-wide movement, a movement that is active in every continent and in countries in all stages of development. It is a movement that is concerned not only with fair prices and better quality of goods, but also with a whole range of public interest issues that bear on the consumer interest, an interest we all share because we are all consumers. It is not just about choice but also about needs and justice.

The earliest United Nations involvement is by Mr. M. Ganji, Special Rapporteur of the UN Commission on Human Rights who aptly stated in his 1975 report that “People must know and assert their rights as consumers, if they are to get the maximum benefit from the development process.”

The movement further attracted the attention of the United Nations through a resolution of the Economic and Social Council adopted in August, 1977, which stated that the “benefits of development measures aimed at raising the standard of living and improving the quality of life of the people of the world would be enhanced if they were accompanied by adequate measures for the protection of individual consumers.”

On 9 April 1986, 25 years ago, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the “Guidelines for Consumer Protection” by consensus through General Assembly resolution 39/248.

The International Organisation of Consumer Unions (IOCU) (now called Consumers International), played a pivotal role and this paper expounds on a strategy framework that involved 'rights' and 'responsibilities'.

The ‘Rights’ Approach

The systematic elaboration of the rights of consumers was first inspired by the US President John F. Kennedy’s historic message to the US Congress on March 15, 1962. In that message, the US President had defined four basic rights of consumers – the right to safety, choice, information and to be heard.

In 1974, the newly established IOCU Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific received a small seed grant of US$500 from the United Nations Educational, Scientific & Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) to develop consumer education materials. As the first and newly appointed Regional Director, I felt the need for a 'rights' approach and decided to do a series of posters on consumer rights as my flagship for my advocacy work.

I had noted that already by that time, two more consumer rights had become accepted among consumers especially as a result of advocacy in Europe – that of right to consumer education and consumer redress.

Further, with the historic 1972 Stockholm World Consumer Congress held after the historic United Nations World Conference on the Environment, IOCU had become increasingly concerned with ‘Green’ issues and I added “the right to a healthy environment” as the seventh right.

The eighth right, that of ‘having consumer basic needs met’ was enunciated in one of my first major speeches as the newly elected President of IOCU on January 2, 1979 at the opening of the pioneering first international workshop on “Consumer Education through Radio” held at the Asia-Pacific Institute of Broadcasting (AIBD) and funded by the government of New Zealand through the efforts of Consumers Institute, New Zealand. The idea behind this right came to me from the ‘basic needs’ approach that was then being promoted by the International Labour Organisation (ILO).

The first time the eight rights were altogether accepted as a whole at an IOCU international meeting was at the Association on South East Asean Nations (ASEAN) consumer protection seminar held in Quezon City (the Philippines) from 1-4 October 1980 where the ASEAN Consumer Protection Declaration and Programme of Action was adopted.

In 1982, as President of IOCU, I felt the 'rights' approach needed greater popular mobilization efforts and proposed that 15 March be adopted as World Consumer Rights Day; this is now an annual global celebration. From then onwards, these eight rights, which are listed and elaborated below, have been adopted as the CI Charter of Consumer Rights:

1. Basic Needs: The right to basic goods and services which guarantee survival: adequate food, clothing, shelter, health care, education and sanitation.

2. Safety: The right to be protected against the marketing of goods or the provisions of services that are hazardous to health and life.

3. Information: The right to be protected against dishonest or misleading advertising or labeling. And the right to be given the facts and information needed to make an informed choice.

4. Choice: The right to choose products and services at competitive prices with an assurance of satisfactory quality.

5. Representation: The right to express consumer interests in the making and execution of government policy.

6. Redress: The right to be compensated for misrepresentation, shoddy goods or unsatisfactory services.

7. Consumer Education: The right to acquire the knowledge and skills necessary to be an informed consumer.

8. Healthy Environment: The right to live and work in an environment which is neither threatening nor dangerous and which permits a life of dignity and well-being.

The 'Responsibilities' Approach

Our experience is that we cannot rely on business to take adequate measures. We cannot also rely entirely on governments, who have various pressures on them. The first task is for consumers to be individually strong and effective because self protection is the ultimate protection. We must, through our own competence and vigilance, initiate action for the protection of consumers. We cannot assume that others will do it for us.

It was useful to have a frame of reference for consumer action and in this connection I launched the following five principles (inspired and suggested as “four cardinal principles” by Prof. Heiko Steffens of Berlin at the 9th IOCU Congress, held in London in 1978), which now provide a framework for a holistic strategy for the consumer movement:

CRITICAL AWARENESS – our citizens must be awakened to be more questioning about the quality of goods and services.


INVOLVEMENT OR ACTION – our citizens must assert themselves and act to ensure that they get a fair deal.

SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY – our citizens must act with social responsibility, with concern and sensitivity to the impact of their actions on other citizens, in particular, in relation to disadvantaged groups in the community and in relation to the economic and social realties prevailing.

ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIBILITY – there must be a heightened sensitivity that consumer decisions impact the physical environment, which should only be developed in a manner that promotes harmony and conservation and we must fight against the degradation of this most critical factor in improving the real quality of life for the present and the future.

SOLIDARITY – the best and most effective action is through cooperative efforts through the formation of citizens groups who together can have the strength and influence to ensure that adequate attention is given to the consumer interest.

The realization/internalization of the above principles, both “rights” and “responsibilities”, or what we may call the CHARTER for CONSUMER ACTION will not be an easy one. It will require commitment, integrity, hard work and consistent, competent and creative vigilance.

It will require also the synergetic cooperation of governments, socially responsible businesses, academics and media as we must never forget that all of us are consumers!

Professor Anwar Fazal is the Director of the Right Livelihood College, Universiti Sains Malaysia. He was President of the International Organisation of Consumers Unions (now called Consumers International) from 1978-1984. He is a recipient of the Right Livelihood Award, popularly called the “Alternative Nobel Prize.”

Friday, 4 February 2011

Katsuko Nomura: a lifetime building the consumer movement

Last year a leading figure of the consumer movement passed away. Katsuko Nomura built consumer rights in Japan at a time when such an idea was foreign, leading to a Nobel Peace prize nomination. Read and watch two other prominent voices from the global consumer movement talk about her contribution.

Anwar Fazal:

Anwar Fazal will be speaking about more milestones in the consumer movement at ConsumersInternational World Congress 2011 in Hong Kong in May.

Ralph Nader:

Katsuko Nomura - a builder of consumer, labour, cooperative and women’s rights groups for over 55 years in Japan - passed away this month at the age of 99. She was one of the most remarkable civic leaders anywhere in the world. With her range of activities, she could be called a world citizen.


Born in 1910 in Kyoto, she lost her husband and many relatives and friends during World War II. Mrs Nomura witnessed crises everywhere, but she also saw vast opportunities for building a just and democratic society. This was no small feat in a male-dominated society under US military occupation.

She started her dynamic career building consumer cooperatives - a banding together that then was critical for families facing drastic shortages of life’s necessities. She took her experience and legislative success with the Cooperative League of Japan to become a founder of the Japan Housewives’ Association whose mass boycotts and marches challenged Japanese companies accustomed to very little government regulation.

She became a strong voice, especially for women, in the General Council of Trade Unions of Japan and helped found the Consumers’ Union of Japan, which she directed for over a decade.

All these formal associations cannot do credit to watching her in action. Well into her eighties, she aroused audiences of younger Japanese activists and prodded them to raise expectations for themselves as change-agents. She was often the toughest person at any gathering.

Neither US food exports to Japan of dubious safety, nor the injustices inflicted on less developed countries by Japanese multinationals escaped her pointed criticism and agendas for action. In 2005 she was nominated as one of ‘1000 women’ for the Nobel Peace Prize.

May her legacy be a source of self-renewing energy for many seekers of justice in this tormented world of ours. For she was the essence of resilient self-renewal.